Risk Assessment Plan Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Risk Assessment Plan - Term Paper Example At one end are the patents and trademarks, which are legally protected and formally recorded. What follows is the knowledge incorporated in formal process and software. There is also the knowledge found in instructions, manuals, as well as other written sources. At the other end is the unwritten knowledge that is enshrined in the way people do the way they do. The risks associated with this category of capital includes: weak and inconsistent work process, inadequate documentation and diffusion of knowledge, and inadequate protection of proprietary knowledge. ii. Human capital Human capital includes all people that work in SunnyVille. The key risks associated with human capital includes: failure to create a culture that values learning and accepts change, inconsistent dissemination across the company and insufficiency of skills levels, and vulnerability to and probability of key staff and management turnover. iii. Relationship capital. Relationship capital includes customer relationsh ips, external network of vendors, partnerships, and outsourced services among many others. The key risks associated with this category of capital include the: threats to the brand, relationship loyalty to individuals, and vulnerability, and probability to partner defections or customers. iv. Business recipe This is the company’s strategy, because the appropriate strategy is an asset. The key risks associated with business recipes include the: exposure to economic cycles, potential substitutes, and threats of new competitors. Project Scope Statement During SunnyVille’s recent IT audit, the final report mentioned that the company’s risk assessment needs greater detail, the IT policies are inadequate, and the overall management of risk itself is unsubstantiated with little oversight from the board of directors. Following these observations, the risk assessment team met on June 10, 2013 to review the scope of risk assessment to be conducted in order to deliberate on how address the problems identified during the audit. The team reviewed the entire risk structure of the company, with strong emphasis being paid on IT policies, intangible risks, as well as the role of board of directors in mitigating risks. The findings of these assessments, reviews, and audit were used to develop risk assessment scope statement. On June 13, 201, SunnyVille’s staff conducted the risk assessment. The aim of this process was to identify threats that could have contributed to the issues raised following the audit. Different stakeholders, including the employees and board of directors were involved in the process of risk assessment. Qualitative/Quantitative Risk Analysis A quantitative method can be used for the risk analysis, whereby the risk will be presented using a variety of scales or through the financial extent as forecasted amount of losses associated with different types of risks (Szczepankiewicz & Szczepankiewicz, 2006). This method will rely on the available data; though where data is not available qualitative approach can be used. For the purpose of setting values, definition of the information will be done in order to ensure proper achievement of different business processes and their relevance for functioning of the company’s units and as a result the whole company (Galach, 2004). There are many Qualitative approaches to risk analysis, including NIST 800-30, CRAMM,

Measuring Progress in the Technological Transformation of Writing Instruction :: Technology

Measuring Progress in the Technological Transformation of Writing Instruction The most provocative rhetorical moment for any new enterprise is the moment in which someone opines what the enterprise will do, will cause, or will enable. Inventor Dean Kamen claims that the Segway will revolutionize personal transportation. But we must wait and see, with varying degrees of anticipation, whether this comes true. In any popular cultural innovation one cares to name, there is an explicit or implicit claim about the way that the innovation will â€Å"change† or â€Å"transform† life, its quality, or its effect. And one of the most prolific generators of pronouncements of future effect has been that enterprise commonly called the â€Å"computer revolution.† Given that the technologized nature of composition renders it just as prone to pronouncements as to how â€Å"things will be†, and given that it’s important to assess any major enterprise by comparing outcomes to original claims, it makes sense that techno-compositionists have been making reflective and summative assertions about the state of technological writing instruction. Cynthia Selfe, Christina Haas, Barbara Blakely Duffelmeyer, and others have recently and specifically called us to look carefully and critically at the implications of what we are doing as teachers of technologized literacy. On a larger scale, It makes sense to look at the claims made in and by the profession of writing teachers about what will happen to the future of writing in a technological age. Here, we review claims made over the last ten years about the transformation of literacy, writing, and its instruction in the pages of College Composition and Communication, College English, and C omputers and Composition. We then assert how far the profession has really come, as opposed to "how far we thought we'd be," and suggest some ways of overcoming the blocks to reaching these goals. We surveyed CE, CCC, and C&C from 1992 through 2002. We looked exclusively for what we call â€Å"will† claims—that is, direct or obviously implied specific predictive claims of what technology will do to teaching, writing, and literacy, or what will happen in these environments. We focused on these strong statements, not on statements of what â€Å"ought† to happen, what â€Å"we need† or â€Å"will need† to do or â€Å"must† or â€Å"should† do. We focused on statements made directly by the authors of the articles or reviews, rather than recapitulation of other authors unless the author or reviewer used it as part of her or his own larger assertion about what â€Å"will be.

Martin Luther King

Martin Luther King Martin Luther King was an extremely inspirational Individual, a humanitarian, call rights activist In fact. He led the Montgomery Bus Boycott In 1955, helped CLC In 1957, helped to organism the March on Washington 1 963 in which he presented his ‘l Have a Dream' speech gaining his reputation as one of the greatest orators in American history. King, born son of Reverend Martin Luther King Sir. Spent most of his early life within church, singing amongst the choir in 1939.He attended Booker T. Washington High school, and then attended Morehouse College without officially graduating school. Then graduated from Crower Theological Seminary with a Bachelor of Totally degree 1951 furthermore, gaining his Doctor of Philosophy In 955, achieving an intelligent and large amount of qualifications which, within the time zone, was extremely unusual as segregation was large within America, specifically, the Deep South.King was one of many leaders yet, what made King so highl y respected and celebrated was his passion for change. King is mainly remembered due to his Inspirational speeches ‘l Have a Dream' for example, which he presented during the call rights march on 1963, Washington of August. In which, he gained respect and admiration from people of all races, being referred to as a ‘Moses' by his lieutenants, during his speech aimed for mainly African-Americans and their segregation, calling out with a nonviolent revolution.Kings admiration from many individuals was proven amongst his death, 1968, as the non-violent movement came to an immediate halt. Yet, not everyone agreed with King's tactics, Malcolm X for example, flying King's non-violent approach, stating that ‘If the man puts a hand on you- send him to the cemetery' Portraying that human self-defense should be remissive, many black individuals praised Malcolm X due to this and believed that a man of bravery should fight back, therefore winning his opponents respect.On the ot her hand, although many applauded Malcolm X for his opinion of self-defense, a larger quantity of black individuals favored King's approach portraying that his judgment and approaches were more successful and presented within a better light, creating positivist for change. Martin's many speeches create a ‘hair rising' upshot, touching our hearts and Imaginations, why?King simply used Imagery, as of which a writer would within his books to grab their reader, yet, King's persuasive imagery created a stir of emotional change, causing his listeners to create their perfect world in their heads , a desegregated America. This then resulted in why King's many followers, did follow him, his powerful, persuasive speeches along with his actions that backed up his many promises. One of which, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, 1955, lasting 382 days In which King provided leadership for the demonstration.The NAACP, Women's Political Company and King drafted three demands for the bus company: sea ting is to be available on a first-come, first-serve axis, drivers have more respect towards black passengers and also, black drivers are hired. Almost 20,000 black individuals supported the MOB resulting in numerous buses driven with empty seats due to black people's usual need for bus transport to and from work, The bus company's refusal resulted In the organization of WA: promise as a leader from only twenty-six, King's leadership skills commenced and transformed from this.The Montgomery Bus Boycott eventually ended, resulting in a huge change within Montgomery and Kings life, creating positivist for change within lack communities and sparking Martin's lead to fame and admiration. Following on from this, during the Montgomery Bus Boycott, King had a religious epiphany in which, when praying aloud felt the sudden presence of God, describing this as a never before presence.King explained that this experience redirected him to the pathway of danger of the Boycott and further protest s, despite the threat that portrayed. Ghanaian on the other hand, was another major influence for King. Shindig's policy of non-violence within India; Kings Involvement in civil rights was therefore tryingly related to Protestant faith. The success of the Bus Boycott placed King as president of the CLC (Southern Christian Leadership Conference) in 1957, the ideals, Christianity yet the method of non-violence, Ghanaian.The assassination of Martin Luther King, 4th April 1968, was a shock to many, the recent killing of John F. Kennedy was as great a shock and King's assassination was the final straw. Depression and anger flooded the streets, black individuals protested once again, yet with violence. Molotov cocktails, bricks and guns were aimed towards anything that depicted white schism, once night drew, more than 100,000 black individuals created havoc and chaos across the country.The assassination of Martin Luther King destroyed the words he once spoke, ‘non-violence' Their fi ght for freedom and desegregation which was once a non-violent movement came crashing down perhaps to represent the life they had taken, the man which had persuaded the black community as well as many white individuals to come together, the man who made a change, the man who was widely known and favored was now gone. Martin Luther King, the man who changed the world. Word count: 852 Martin Luther King Alan Mason period 8 Martin Luther King v. Malcolm X Martin Luther King has been known for using peace to help him get equality among all people but especially African-Americans. He was not the type of leader that resorted to violence in order to get the equality that he fought for. King has been known for moving people by the use of his speeches like King's I Have a Dream and Vive Been to the Mountaintop speeches. King shows through these speeches that even though he was determined to get equal rights for every African-American, he as only going to stick to subtle, nonviolent ways like court cases, protest, and boycotts.This philosophy Is the exact opposite to Malcolm X, another Call Rights Leader, who thought that African American should not waste their time on protest and boycotts (Document 7). Malcolm, like King, was not In favor of violence but believe that African Americans should by all meaner use violence to protect themselves when they â€Å"attacked by racists† (Docum ent 9). But, Martin Luther King's philosophy was more beneficial for the African-American community then Malcolm Ax's because the effort that he put into his nonviolent philosophy made gaining rights more successful and more meaningful.Martin Luther King showed that he had the better philosophy compared to Malcolm X because of his stance on violence. One way King upheld his beliefs was through protest. King said in his Our God is Marching speech, â€Å"We are on the move now. The burning of our churches will not deter us. We are on the move now. The bombing of our homes will not dissuade us† (Document 4). So Protesters, including King himself were having their homes burned down for retesting for what they believe is right. In March of 1965 King and other protesters walked in order to raise awareness of the need for a Voting Right Act. This Act was passed later that year.But even though they achieved their goal for voting right does not mean that the protesters did not receive opposition for their actions. Mass arrest, police attacks, and state troopers blockading all occurred throughout the walk. If King chose to fight back then that could have either delayed getting the Voting Right Act approved, or it may have been felt that African-Americans did not deserve to get the Act approved. But King Just showed by obtaining from violence you can still get what you want. Martin Luther King showed that there were other ways to fight for what you want aside form fighting itself.King did this by using boycotts and strikes. He said, â€Å"There Is nothing quite so effective as refusal to cooperate economically with the forces and Institutions. † King realized that one of the ways he was going to get American to give them the rights that African-Americans wanted was by disrupting the flow of money that was going Into the Caucasian shops. This meaner by not buying from places that o not offer Jobs for African-Americans then those businesses would see how much they needed the African-American community, even If It meant having to hire African- American workers.Malcolm X did not agree with boycotts and strikes he said, â€Å"We have to learn how to own and operate the businesses of our community and develop to be involved in picketing and boycotting other people in other communities in order to get a Job† (Document 7). But this idea completely went against the philosophy of being together not separate. If this would have happened then the country would eave always been separate and things would have never been equal.Martin Luther king has been known for using his words instead of his fist when it comes to defending what he many thousands of others believed to be correct. King once said in his I Have a Dream speech that he had a dream that â€Å"former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood†¦ They will not be Judged by the color of their skin but by their charac ter†¦ We will be able to work together, pray together, to struggle together, to go o Jail together, to climb up for freedom together† (Document 2).King fought for African Americans rights by using his words. He told the people of his desires for and equal and fair life where people could live in harmony with each other and not be judged by their skin tone. He thought of a time where there would be no more separate but equal as were stated prior, people would be able to â€Å"work together†¦ And go to Jail together. † (Document 2) So by using his speeches where thousands of people came to listen to him talk, he moved a nation to be in favor of his reasoning's.In conclusion, Martin Luther Kings philosophy was more beneficial for the African- American community then Malcolm Ax's because the effort that he put into his nonviolent philosophy made gaining rights more successful and more meaningful. King kept up with his no violence idea by participating in other thi ngs that got America's attention like protest, boycotts and speeches. King striver to achieve equality and because of his hard efforts he has succeeded in more ways than one to help African-Americans get the same civil rights as Caucasian Americans. Martin Luther King I admire Martin Luther King Jr. ; his transformational leadership was and remains important throughout American History. He inspired thousands of people with his speeches. His famous speech â€Å"I Had a Dream† shows his leadership style, he was very effective in giving his message. Although many transformational leaders have been remembered in the past decades, Martin Luther King Jr. has created a legacy. If it wasn’t for his transformational leadership, our nation could be in a different mindset overall. He had a way to get people working together rather than fighting. He was quiet and listened slowly while others would speak. His visions developed easily with others to excite and convert followers. His example of a servant leadership is the most important lesson I feel he has left behind. Being a servant leader that offers not only inclusive vision, but listens carefully to others, persuades through reasons and helps while building the community. Believing in others was key to his success. Transformational leaders create visions that inspire and motivate others to strive for a goal in leading others. Martin Luther King was passionate about his visions and was committed to success no matter what he had to face. He was a preacher who believed when people were seeing what the color of your skin was; they were all equal in God’s eyes. One idea that Martin Luther King shared in his message was how freedom could be accomplished without violence. He preached racial equality and wanted a nonviolent world filled with peace. Martin Luther King had an effective way of speaking to people. Usually he spoke to large emotional crowds, encouraging peace. His self-confidence translated to courage. Dr. King had the ability to create and communicate his visions during his speech. His persuasion and demeanor made him an effective leader. He was able to motivate thousands of people who were in desperate need and angry people who acted violently. He changed their perspective and led them to non violent acts. He was direct and honest. He was a man of influence because he knew the existing conditions and focused on changing the culture. It was a challenge to work against angry people who resisted him because he wanted a change. Martin Luther King was successful though his followers, his example of being non-violent and living in peace led his followers to have the same vision and live it. He was able to shift an entre culture by using the transformational leadership style to effectively motivate change throughout the world. Martin Luther King demonstrated his role as a leader by showing how much he cared and putting needs of others first. His way of motivating others with his speech opened optimistic views for his followers. His leadership style reached many people’s lives and gave them an emotional connection, which led to more followers. His message wasn’t only what caught the follower’s attention, but his level of education qualified him to be a respected leader. Many African Americans at the time were not graduating high school, yet he had a PhD from a respected school named Boston University. As we’ve learned transformational leaders also show Individual consideration in the same way – â€Å"Leaders also mentor followers by teaching and sharing knowledge and skills in addition to showing emotional concern and support†. (Weiss, 2012). Martin Luther King also showed Individualized consideration to his followers, and it was well trusted by his followers. Martin Luther King Jr. included ethical standards to consistently attempt to â€Å"do the right thing’. Leaders using their vision to inspire and transform will show in their actions. He was known to practice the same leadership he preached. Martin Luther King always spoke about the hopes and aspirations of his followers. His actions appealed to peoples highest standards of ethics and morality which is where most of his decisions came from. Great leaders possess high ethical standards and set examples for their followers who do the right thing. Martin Luther King Martin Luther King Martin Luther King was an extremely inspirational Individual, a humanitarian, call rights activist In fact. He led the Montgomery Bus Boycott In 1955, helped CLC In 1957, helped to organism the March on Washington 1 963 in which he presented his ‘l Have a Dream' speech gaining his reputation as one of the greatest orators in American history. King, born son of Reverend Martin Luther King Sir. Spent most of his early life within church, singing amongst the choir in 1939.He attended Booker T. Washington High school, and then attended Morehouse College without officially graduating school. Then graduated from Crower Theological Seminary with a Bachelor of Totally degree 1951 furthermore, gaining his Doctor of Philosophy In 955, achieving an intelligent and large amount of qualifications which, within the time zone, was extremely unusual as segregation was large within America, specifically, the Deep South.King was one of many leaders yet, what made King so highl y respected and celebrated was his passion for change. King is mainly remembered due to his Inspirational speeches ‘l Have a Dream' for example, which he presented during the call rights march on 1963, Washington of August. In which, he gained respect and admiration from people of all races, being referred to as a ‘Moses' by his lieutenants, during his speech aimed for mainly African-Americans and their segregation, calling out with a nonviolent revolution.Kings admiration from many individuals was proven amongst his death, 1968, as the non-violent movement came to an immediate halt. Yet, not everyone agreed with King's tactics, Malcolm X for example, flying King's non-violent approach, stating that ‘If the man puts a hand on you- send him to the cemetery' Portraying that human self-defense should be remissive, many black individuals praised Malcolm X due to this and believed that a man of bravery should fight back, therefore winning his opponents respect.On the ot her hand, although many applauded Malcolm X for his opinion of self-defense, a larger quantity of black individuals favored King's approach portraying that his judgment and approaches were more successful and presented within a better light, creating positivist for change. Martin's many speeches create a ‘hair rising' upshot, touching our hearts and Imaginations, why?King simply used Imagery, as of which a writer would within his books to grab their reader, yet, King's persuasive imagery created a stir of emotional change, causing his listeners to create their perfect world in their heads , a desegregated America. This then resulted in why King's many followers, did follow him, his powerful, persuasive speeches along with his actions that backed up his many promises. One of which, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, 1955, lasting 382 days In which King provided leadership for the demonstration.The NAACP, Women's Political Company and King drafted three demands for the bus company: sea ting is to be available on a first-come, first-serve axis, drivers have more respect towards black passengers and also, black drivers are hired. Almost 20,000 black individuals supported the MOB resulting in numerous buses driven with empty seats due to black people's usual need for bus transport to and from work, The bus company's refusal resulted In the organization of WA: promise as a leader from only twenty-six, King's leadership skills commenced and transformed from this.The Montgomery Bus Boycott eventually ended, resulting in a huge change within Montgomery and Kings life, creating positivist for change within lack communities and sparking Martin's lead to fame and admiration. Following on from this, during the Montgomery Bus Boycott, King had a religious epiphany in which, when praying aloud felt the sudden presence of God, describing this as a never before presence.King explained that this experience redirected him to the pathway of danger of the Boycott and further protest s, despite the threat that portrayed. Ghanaian on the other hand, was another major influence for King. Shindig's policy of non-violence within India; Kings Involvement in civil rights was therefore tryingly related to Protestant faith. The success of the Bus Boycott placed King as president of the CLC (Southern Christian Leadership Conference) in 1957, the ideals, Christianity yet the method of non-violence, Ghanaian.The assassination of Martin Luther King, 4th April 1968, was a shock to many, the recent killing of John F. Kennedy was as great a shock and King's assassination was the final straw. Depression and anger flooded the streets, black individuals protested once again, yet with violence. Molotov cocktails, bricks and guns were aimed towards anything that depicted white schism, once night drew, more than 100,000 black individuals created havoc and chaos across the country.The assassination of Martin Luther King destroyed the words he once spoke, ‘non-violence' Their fi ght for freedom and desegregation which was once a non-violent movement came crashing down perhaps to represent the life they had taken, the man which had persuaded the black community as well as many white individuals to come together, the man who made a change, the man who was widely known and favored was now gone. Martin Luther King, the man who changed the world. Word count: 852 Martin Luther King Martin Luther King Martin Luther King was an extremely inspirational Individual, a humanitarian, call rights activist In fact. He led the Montgomery Bus Boycott In 1955, helped CLC In 1957, helped to organism the March on Washington 1 963 in which he presented his ‘l Have a Dream' speech gaining his reputation as one of the greatest orators in American history. King, born son of Reverend Martin Luther King Sir. Spent most of his early life within church, singing amongst the choir in 1939.He attended Booker T. Washington High school, and then attended Morehouse College without officially graduating school. Then graduated from Crower Theological Seminary with a Bachelor of Totally degree 1951 furthermore, gaining his Doctor of Philosophy In 955, achieving an intelligent and large amount of qualifications which, within the time zone, was extremely unusual as segregation was large within America, specifically, the Deep South.King was one of many leaders yet, what made King so highl y respected and celebrated was his passion for change. King is mainly remembered due to his Inspirational speeches ‘l Have a Dream' for example, which he presented during the call rights march on 1963, Washington of August. In which, he gained respect and admiration from people of all races, being referred to as a ‘Moses' by his lieutenants, during his speech aimed for mainly African-Americans and their segregation, calling out with a nonviolent revolution.Kings admiration from many individuals was proven amongst his death, 1968, as the non-violent movement came to an immediate halt. Yet, not everyone agreed with King's tactics, Malcolm X for example, flying King's non-violent approach, stating that ‘If the man puts a hand on you- send him to the cemetery' Portraying that human self-defense should be remissive, many black individuals praised Malcolm X due to this and believed that a man of bravery should fight back, therefore winning his opponents respect.On the ot her hand, although many applauded Malcolm X for his opinion of self-defense, a larger quantity of black individuals favored King's approach portraying that his judgment and approaches were more successful and presented within a better light, creating positivist for change. Martin's many speeches create a ‘hair rising' upshot, touching our hearts and Imaginations, why?King simply used Imagery, as of which a writer would within his books to grab their reader, yet, King's persuasive imagery created a stir of emotional change, causing his listeners to create their perfect world in their heads , a desegregated America. This then resulted in why King's many followers, did follow him, his powerful, persuasive speeches along with his actions that backed up his many promises. One of which, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, 1955, lasting 382 days In which King provided leadership for the demonstration.The NAACP, Women's Political Company and King drafted three demands for the bus company: sea ting is to be available on a first-come, first-serve axis, drivers have more respect towards black passengers and also, black drivers are hired. Almost 20,000 black individuals supported the MOB resulting in numerous buses driven with empty seats due to black people's usual need for bus transport to and from work, The bus company's refusal resulted In the organization of WA: promise as a leader from only twenty-six, King's leadership skills commenced and transformed from this.The Montgomery Bus Boycott eventually ended, resulting in a huge change within Montgomery and Kings life, creating positivist for change within lack communities and sparking Martin's lead to fame and admiration. Following on from this, during the Montgomery Bus Boycott, King had a religious epiphany in which, when praying aloud felt the sudden presence of God, describing this as a never before presence.King explained that this experience redirected him to the pathway of danger of the Boycott and further protest s, despite the threat that portrayed. Ghanaian on the other hand, was another major influence for King. Shindig's policy of non-violence within India; Kings Involvement in civil rights was therefore tryingly related to Protestant faith. The success of the Bus Boycott placed King as president of the CLC (Southern Christian Leadership Conference) in 1957, the ideals, Christianity yet the method of non-violence, Ghanaian.The assassination of Martin Luther King, 4th April 1968, was a shock to many, the recent killing of John F. Kennedy was as great a shock and King's assassination was the final straw. Depression and anger flooded the streets, black individuals protested once again, yet with violence. Molotov cocktails, bricks and guns were aimed towards anything that depicted white schism, once night drew, more than 100,000 black individuals created havoc and chaos across the country.The assassination of Martin Luther King destroyed the words he once spoke, ‘non-violence' Their fi ght for freedom and desegregation which was once a non-violent movement came crashing down perhaps to represent the life they had taken, the man which had persuaded the black community as well as many white individuals to come together, the man who made a change, the man who was widely known and favored was now gone. Martin Luther King, the man who changed the world. Word count: 852 Martin Luther King Alan Mason period 8 Martin Luther King v. Malcolm X Martin Luther King has been known for using peace to help him get equality among all people but especially African-Americans. He was not the type of leader that resorted to violence in order to get the equality that he fought for. King has been known for moving people by the use of his speeches like King's I Have a Dream and Vive Been to the Mountaintop speeches. King shows through these speeches that even though he was determined to get equal rights for every African-American, he as only going to stick to subtle, nonviolent ways like court cases, protest, and boycotts.This philosophy Is the exact opposite to Malcolm X, another Call Rights Leader, who thought that African American should not waste their time on protest and boycotts (Document 7). Malcolm, like King, was not In favor of violence but believe that African Americans should by all meaner use violence to protect themselves when they â€Å"attacked by racists† (Docum ent 9). But, Martin Luther King's philosophy was more beneficial for the African-American community then Malcolm Ax's because the effort that he put into his nonviolent philosophy made gaining rights more successful and more meaningful.Martin Luther King showed that he had the better philosophy compared to Malcolm X because of his stance on violence. One way King upheld his beliefs was through protest. King said in his Our God is Marching speech, â€Å"We are on the move now. The burning of our churches will not deter us. We are on the move now. The bombing of our homes will not dissuade us† (Document 4). So Protesters, including King himself were having their homes burned down for retesting for what they believe is right. In March of 1965 King and other protesters walked in order to raise awareness of the need for a Voting Right Act. This Act was passed later that year.But even though they achieved their goal for voting right does not mean that the protesters did not receive opposition for their actions. Mass arrest, police attacks, and state troopers blockading all occurred throughout the walk. If King chose to fight back then that could have either delayed getting the Voting Right Act approved, or it may have been felt that African-Americans did not deserve to get the Act approved. But King Just showed by obtaining from violence you can still get what you want. Martin Luther King showed that there were other ways to fight for what you want aside form fighting itself.King did this by using boycotts and strikes. He said, â€Å"There Is nothing quite so effective as refusal to cooperate economically with the forces and Institutions. † King realized that one of the ways he was going to get American to give them the rights that African-Americans wanted was by disrupting the flow of money that was going Into the Caucasian shops. This meaner by not buying from places that o not offer Jobs for African-Americans then those businesses would see how much they needed the African-American community, even If It meant having to hire African- American workers.Malcolm X did not agree with boycotts and strikes he said, â€Å"We have to learn how to own and operate the businesses of our community and develop to be involved in picketing and boycotting other people in other communities in order to get a Job† (Document 7). But this idea completely went against the philosophy of being together not separate. If this would have happened then the country would eave always been separate and things would have never been equal.Martin Luther king has been known for using his words instead of his fist when it comes to defending what he many thousands of others believed to be correct. King once said in his I Have a Dream speech that he had a dream that â€Å"former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood†¦ They will not be Judged by the color of their skin but by their charac ter†¦ We will be able to work together, pray together, to struggle together, to go o Jail together, to climb up for freedom together† (Document 2).King fought for African Americans rights by using his words. He told the people of his desires for and equal and fair life where people could live in harmony with each other and not be judged by their skin tone. He thought of a time where there would be no more separate but equal as were stated prior, people would be able to â€Å"work together†¦ And go to Jail together. † (Document 2) So by using his speeches where thousands of people came to listen to him talk, he moved a nation to be in favor of his reasoning's.In conclusion, Martin Luther Kings philosophy was more beneficial for the African- American community then Malcolm Ax's because the effort that he put into his nonviolent philosophy made gaining rights more successful and more meaningful. King kept up with his no violence idea by participating in other thi ngs that got America's attention like protest, boycotts and speeches. King striver to achieve equality and because of his hard efforts he has succeeded in more ways than one to help African-Americans get the same civil rights as Caucasian Americans.

Essay on Mercutio of William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet

Mercutio of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet Although the story of Romeo and Juliet does not focus on Mercutio, to many, he is one of the most interesting characters in literature. His name puns on the word mercurial which meansunpredictably changeable. His unsteady behavior makes him wise beyond his intentions. Arecurring trend in Shakespeare’s plays is the existence of a witty fool and many foolish wits. People such as Romeo, Friar Laurence, and Capulet are people who are made out to be wise, but,in the end, they make all the wrong decisions. Mercutio serves as a foil to all these characters. He is considered by every character in the play to be a fool, but, in the long run, he is the one whois the wisest. He brings a†¦show more content†¦In Act two, Scene one, after Mercutio realizes Romeo does not want to be found by him, Mercutio mocks Romeo’s feelings for Rosaline. He suggests that Romeo is shallow and that he isin love with Rosaline’s good looks and shapely body. Romeo quickly denies Mercutio’s accusation in the beginning of Act two, Scene 2, â€Å"He jests scars that never felt a wound (II.ii. 1).† Even Friar Laurence realizes Romeo’s shallowness when he hears Romeo has forgotten about Rosaline and is now infatuated with Juliet. Even though Friar Laurence says, â€Å"Wisely and slow. They stumble that run fast (II.iii. 94).†, his curtain of phantasm makes him think he can go againstthis wise judgment. Mercutio is the only character that always stays with his initial judgment. Mercutio believes that sexual satisfaction is the only thing people feel for one another. That love is a man-made front used to justify a sexual relationship. â€Å"Why, is not this better nowthan groaning for love? now art thou sociable, now art thou Romeo; not art thou what thou art,by art as well as by nature: for this drivelling love is like a great natural, that runs lolling up anddown to hide his bauble in a hole (II.iv 82-87).† He describes love as a natural or somethingillegitimate and fake. Then he uses the metaphor of a â€Å"bauble in a hole† to say that all that aperson who claims to be in love really wants is sexual contentment. Once again his words altertheShow MoreRelatedThe Significance of Mercutio in William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet1961 Words   |  8 PagesThe Significance of Mercutio in William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet is about two lovers whose families are at war and how the two overcome the family feud for their love for each other. Mercutio is one of the central characters in the play; he is one of the princes kinsmen and is best friend to Romeo of the Montague household. The name Mercutio is derived for the word mercurial which means eloquent, active and changeable; Mercutio is all three because Read MoreShakespeares Romeo and Juliet and Baz Luhrmanns Romeo + Juliet 1154 Words   |  5 PagesWilliam Shakespeares The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, set in 16th century Verona, Italy shares differences with Baz Luhrmanns Romeo + Juliet, set in modern day Verona Beach. These stories contain the same characters and conflict, however major and minor discrepancies are galore in the story lines of both formats of William Shakespeares creation. Some major inconsistencies occur, such as Mercutio dying at a beach, portrayed as a hero, instead of being at a bar, looking like a fool, Friar LawrencesRead MoreAppropriation Of Romeo And Juliet1135 Words   |  5 Pagesunderstand William Shakespeare’s play Romeo and Juliet. This is why director Baz Luhrmann created a modern film appropriation of the classic text called Romeo + Juliet. The film was constructed to appeal to a younger movie-going audience to assist th em in understanding the original text by William Shakespeare through the use of strong visual and aural techniques. An appropriation involves taking a well known text and inserting it into another context. In order to modernise the classic text Romeo and JulietRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Romeo And Juliet1696 Words   |  7 Pagesreferences to William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet as a notable representation of genuine hetero love. This theory intends to dig all the more profoundly into the issues of affection and sexuality in the play and investigate its inconspicuous underlying topics of homoeroticism and hazardous heterosexuality through a dissection of the film adjustments of Romeo and Juliet from the recent twentieth-century: Franco Zeffirelli‟s 1968 Romeo and Juliet and Baz Luhrmann‟s 1996 William Shakespeare s Romeo + JulietRead More Theme of Fate and Choice in Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet Essay782 Words   |  4 PagesChoice, in William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet In William Shakespeares tragic play Romeo and Juliet, there are four quotes about fate and choice. The characters in the play choose their own fate, it happens because of their choices or actions. First, in the beginning of the play Romeo and Juliet are referred to as a pair of star-crossed lovers (Romeo and Juliet, Prologue). Second, Romeo explains to Mercutio how he has a dream that if he goes to the Montague party he will die, but Romeo choosesRead MoreThe Dramatic Effectiveness of Act III Scene I of William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet658 Words   |  3 PagesThe Dramatic Effectiveness of Act III Scene I of William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet In this climatic central scene of the play Tybalt kills Mercutio (a close friend to Romeo.) Romeo kills Tybalt (his cousin in-law.) and is banished forever from Verona (where his wife- Juliet lives.). The audience are aware that Romeo and Juliet had fallen in love at the Capulet ball and have been married by the Friar Lawrence in the previous scene. The friar wanted to unite the twoRead MoreMercutio - a Monodimensional and Static Character in Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet?1718 Words   |  7 PagesDiscuss Mercutio in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet in terms of character dimension, character development and his relation to major themes of the play. When looking at the content of characters in Shakespeare’s play „Romeo and Julietâ€Å" one can find a total of 21 people that are mentioned by name. While it is self-evident that characters such as Romeo and Juliet are essential to the play due to the fact that they form its title, a reader could ask what role the others might play in a literary contextRead MoreRomeo and Juliet FOIL Characters Essay1569 Words   |  7 Pagesliterature more prudent than in William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, as he effectively engages the use of foil characters. In the play, two lovers from opposing, and hateful families fall in love, but the hatred between households lead to their downfall. Characters in the immoral city of Verona are set to represent key themes and elements of tragedy, and these features are illuminated by the strong use of foil characters. In William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Romeo’s qualities are emphasizedRead MoreViolence and Conflic t in Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare765 Words   |  4 PagesViolence and Conflict in Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare Romeo and Juliet is a tragic play written by William Shakespeare. This play is about star crossed lovers who are from two different warring families, the Capulets and the Montagues. Romeo, the leading male of the play is of the Montague family and his destined lover Juliet is of the Capulets. In this essay I am discussing the violence and conflict Read More The Dramatization of Act 3 Scene 1 of William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet1010 Words   |  5 PagesThe Dramatization of Act 3 Scene 1 of William Shakespeares Romeo and Juliet Romeo and Juliet is a very famous play about two lovers in two different families who are rivals. Romeo and Juliet has love, passion, fighting, sadness, madness, lust and jealousy packed into one. It was written by William Shakespeare around 1595 over 400 years ago. Romeo and Juliet is a great play for all ages and genders this is one of the things that makes it so special. This is why it is still